Thank you for distribution your own manuscript so you can PLOS One to
- PLoS One to. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Choice Page 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Typed online 2022 Jun 31. doi: /diary.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung, Area Publisher Copyright © 2022 Johnson Chun-Play Cheung
This might be an unbarred availability article delivered under the terms of new Creative Commons Attribution License, and therefore it permits unrestricted play with, shipping, and you may reproduction in just about any average, provided the first creator and resource was credited.
If you need making alter to your financial revelation, excite include their upgraded report in your employment cover letter
Immediately following consideration, we believe so it provides merit but cannot totally fulfill PLOS An individual’s publication standards because currently stands. Therefore, we receive one complete a modified form of the newest manuscript that addresses the fresh new activities elevated inside the opinion processes.
Delight submit your own modified manuscript because of the . If you will you prefer longer than just so it accomplish the posts, excite react to which content otherwise get in touch with the brand new journal work environment from the As you prepare add their enhance, log in to and pick brand new ‘Submissions Trying to find Revision’ folder in order to to get their manuscript file.
An effective rebuttal letter one to responds upptГ¤cka denna information hГ¤r to each point elevated by instructional publisher and you may customer(s). You really need to publish this page since the a unique file labeled ‘Response to Reviewers’.
Reasonable-right up backup of the manuscript one to shows changes designed to this new original adaptation. You ought to publish which since the a different sort of file branded ‘Revised Manuscript that have Song Changes’.
A keen unmarked style of the revised paper versus tracked changes. You really need to upload that it as another document branded ‘Manuscript’.
When the appropriate, we recommend that your deposit your own laboratory protocols directly into increase brand new reproducibility of one’s performance. assigns the process its own identifier (DOI) therefore it is going to be cited independently later on. To possess rules find: Likewise, PLOS You to definitely has the benefit of a choice for publishing fellow-reviewed Laboratory Process content, hence explain standards organized on . Find out more information regarding sharing standards on
step 1. Please ensure that your manuscript match PLOS Your style conditions, together with the individuals getting file naming. The new PLOS You to definitely design layouts is available from the
“So it venture was backed by a sufferers regarding Crime Work (VOCA) government admission-using give approved to the office of your own Colorado Governor (OOG) Child Sex Trafficking Class and you will Traffick911. The new recruit from the method – Traffick911 – has helped to the studies construction and investigation range plan revealed within protocol. Traffick911 directors keeps recognized brand new process discussed here. The latest feedback, findings, findings, and you may guidance indicated within this guide are the ones of one’s copywriter(s) plus don’t fundamentally reflect the views of one’s VOCA, OOG, or Traffick911.
Please county exactly what character new funders got from the study. When your funders didn’t come with role, excite county: “”The latest funders didn’t come with role in the studies structure, study collection and analysis, choice to publish, or thinking of your own manuscript.””
Please tend to be this amended Character of Funder statement on the cover letter; we’ll alter the on the web entry means in your stead.
step three. Your own stability declaration is always to just can be found in the ways section of your manuscript. If your stability declaration is written in virtually any area as well as the Methods, please delete it out-of any other area.
Reviewer #1: So it method describes an important evaluation off an anti-sex trafficking system, in addition to resulting analyses will almost certainly feel an important addition with the industry
p2: The brand new fact getting 300,000 on-chance young people should be clarified, while the bounds wherein young people are believed at risk inside so it ticket are not the same once the those used up later inside the the methods to determine and that people are “at risk” and qualified to receive the applying. What are going to be revised during these introductory paragraphs and in the methods to make it obvious towards the reader this particular discrepancy is available.
